Heavy metal contamination of soils is a widespread environmental issue that poses serious risks to human health and ecosystems. Toxic metals like lead (Pb), arsenic (As), and zinc (Zn) can accumulate in soils from various sources, including industrial activities, mining operations, pesticide use, and urban runoff. When present at elevated levels, these heavy metals can be taken up by plants and enter the food chain, leading to potential health problems for humans and animals.
Fortunately, certain common plants possess the remarkable ability to absorb and accumulate heavy metals from contaminated soils, offering a promising solution for remediation through a process known as phytoremediation. This article explores the use of readily available plants for removing heavy metals from garden soils through bioaccumulation.
Bioaccumulation and Phytoremediation
Bioaccumulation refers to the process by which living organisms, including plants, accumulate substances from their environment at a rate faster than they can eliminate them. In the context of heavy metal contamination, certain plants have developed specialized mechanisms to absorb, translocate, and accumulate high concentrations of specific heavy metals in their tissues, a phenomenon known as hyperaccumulation.
Phytoremediation is an eco-friendly and cost-effective technique that utilizes the natural ability of plants to remove, degrade, or immobilize contaminants from soil, water, and air. When applied to heavy metal remediation, phytoremediation leverages the bioaccumulation capabilities of plants to extract and concentrate heavy metals from contaminated soils.
Common Plants for Heavy Metal Accumulation
While some specialized hyperaccumulator plants have been identified for specific heavy metals, several common and readily available plants have also demonstrated the ability to accumulate and tolerate moderate levels of heavy metal contamination. These plants can be effectively utilized in phytoremediation strategies for garden soils, offering a practical and accessible solution for homeowners and gardeners.
Lead (Pb) Accumulators
1. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus): Sunflowers are known for their ability to accumulate lead in their roots, stems, and leaves, making them suitable for phytoextraction of lead-contaminated soils.
2. Mustard greens (Brassica juncea): Indian mustard is a well-studied hyperaccumulator of lead, capable of accumulating high concentrations in its shoots and leaves.
3. Hemp (Cannabis sativa): Recent research has shown that industrial hemp can effectively accumulate lead in its aboveground biomass, making it a promising candidate for phytoremediation.
Arsenic (As) Accumulators
1. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus): In addition to lead, sunflowers have demonstrated the ability to accumulate arsenic in their roots, stems, and leaves, making them suitable for arsenic phytoextraction.
2. Ferns (Pteris spp.): Several fern species, such as the Chinese brake fern (Pteris vittata) and the Cretan brake fern (Pteris cretica), are known hyperaccumulators of arsenic, capable of accumulating high levels in their fronds.
3. Tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum): While not considered hyperaccumulators, tomato plants have shown the ability to accumulate moderate levels of arsenic in their fruits and shoots, making them potential candidates for phytoremediation.
Zinc (Zn) Accumulators
1. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus): The versatile sunflower plant can also accumulate zinc in its tissues, making it a valuable option for zinc phytoremediation.
2. Mustard greens (Brassica juncea): In addition to lead, Indian mustard has been found to accumulate zinc in its shoots and leaves, contributing to its phytoremediation potential.
3. Radish (Raphanus sativus): Radish plants have demonstrated the ability to accumulate zinc in their roots and shoots, offering a potential solution for zinc-contaminated soils.
It's important to note that the accumulation of heavy metals in plants can vary depending on factors such as soil properties, environmental conditions, and plant cultivars. Additionally, while these common plants can accumulate moderate levels of heavy metals, they may not be as effective as specialized hyperaccumulator species for highly contaminated sites.
Phytoremediation Techniques
Several phytoremediation techniques can be employed using common accumulator plants to remove heavy metals from garden soils:
1. Phytoextraction: This technique involves the cultivation of accumulator plants that absorb and concentrate heavy metals in their aboveground biomass, which can then be harvested and properly disposed of or processed to recover the metals.
2. Phytostabilization: In this approach, plants are used to immobilize heavy metals in the soil by binding them to their root systems or precipitating them, reducing their mobility and bioavailability.
3. Rhizofiltration: This technique utilizes plant roots to absorb and concentrate heavy metals from contaminated water or aqueous waste streams, which can be particularly useful for treating industrial effluents or runoff.
4. Phytovolatilization: Certain plants can absorb and volatilize specific heavy metals, such as mercury and selenium, from the soil or water into the atmosphere, although this technique requires careful monitoring to prevent air pollution.
Considerations and Best Practices
When implementing phytoremediation strategies using common accumulator plants, several considerations and best practices should be followed:
1. Site assessment: Conduct a thorough assessment of the contaminated site, including soil testing to determine the type and concentration of heavy metals present, as well as other soil properties that may influence plant growth and metal uptake.
2. Plant selection: Choose appropriate accumulator plants based on the specific heavy metals present, their accumulation potential, and their suitability for the local climate and soil conditions.
3. Soil amendments: Incorporate soil amendments, such as chelating agents or organic matter, to increase the bioavailability and mobility of heavy metals, enhancing their uptake by plants.
4. Crop rotation: Rotate different accumulator plants to maximize the removal of multiple heavy metals and prevent the depletion of soil nutrients.
5. Biomass management: Properly harvest and dispose of or process the contaminated plant biomass to prevent the reintroduction of heavy metals into the environment or the food chain.
6. Monitoring and maintenance: Regularly monitor plant growth, soil conditions, and heavy metal levels to assess the effectiveness of the phytoremediation process and make necessary adjustments.
7. Regulatory compliance: Ensure compliance with local and national regulations regarding the handling and disposal of contaminated plant materials and soil.
Conclusion
The use of common and readily available plants for bioaccumulation and phytoremediation offers a promising and accessible solution for removing heavy metals like lead, arsenic, and zinc from contaminated garden soils. By leveraging the natural abilities of plants such as sunflowers, mustard greens, hemp, ferns, tomatoes, and radishes, homeowners and gardeners can effectively remediate moderate levels of heavy metal contamination in an eco-friendly and cost-effective manner.
However, it is crucial to carefully assess site conditions, select appropriate accumulator plants, and follow best practices for soil amendments, crop rotation, biomass management, and monitoring to ensure the successful implementation of phytoremediation strategies. With proper planning and execution, the use of common accumulator plants can contribute to the restoration of healthy and safe garden soils, promoting sustainable gardening practices and mitigating the risks associated with heavy metal pollution.
Sources:
Wuana, R. A., & Okieimen, F. E. (2011). Heavy metals in contaminated soils: a review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2011.
Järup, L. (2003). Hazards of heavy metal contamination. British Medical Bulletin, 68(1), 167-182.
Arnot, J. A., & Gobas, F. A. (2006). A review of bioconcentration factor (BCF) and bioaccumulation factor (BAF) assessments for organic chemicals in aquatic organisms. Environmental Reviews, 14(4), 257-297.
Rascio, N., & Navari-Izzo, F. (2011). Heavy metal hyperaccumulating plants: how and why do they do it? And what makes them so interesting?. Plant Science, 180(2), 169-181.
Ali, H., Khan, E., & Sajad, M. A. (2013). Phytoremediation of heavy metals—concepts and applications. Chemosphere, 91(7), 869-881.
Nehnevajova, E., Herzig, R., Federer, G., Erismann, K. H., & Schwitzguébel, J. P. (2005). Screening of sunflower cultivars for metal phytoextraction in a contaminated field prior to mutagenesis. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 7(4), 337-349.
Rizwan, M., Ali, S., Adrees, M., Rizvi, H., Zia-ur-Rehman, M., Hannan, F., ... & Ok, Y. S. (2016). Cadmium stress in rice: toxic effects, tolerance mechanisms, and management: a critical review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(18), 17859-17879.
Niu, Z. X., Sun, L. N., Sun, T. H., Li, Y. S., & Wang, H. (2007). Evaluation of phytoextracting cadmium and lead by sunflower, ricinus, alfalfa and mustard in hydroponic culture. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 19(8), 961-967.
Ahmad, R., Tehsin, Z., Malik, S. T., Asad, S. A., Shahzad, M., Bilal, M., ... & Shah, G. M. (2016). Phytoremediation potential of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.): identification and characterization of heavy metals responsive genes. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water, 44(2), 195-201.
Nehnevajova, E., Herzig, R., Federer, G., Erismann, K. H., & Schwitzguébel, J. P. (2007). Screening of sunflower cultivars for metal phytoextraction in a contaminated field prior to mutagenesis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 14(5), 329-340.
Visoottiviseth, P., Francesconi, K., & Sridokchan, W. (2002). The potential of Thai indigenous plant species for the phytoremediation of arsenic contaminated land. Environmental Pollution, 118(3), 453-461.
Cai, Y., Georgiev, O., & Mehta, M. (2009). Phytoextraction potential of Pteris vittata L. for arsenic-contaminated soils. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 39(1-2), 1-14.
Cai, Y., & Ma, L. Q. (2003). Metal tolerance, accumulation, and detoxification in plants with emphasis on arsenic in terrestrial plants. In Biogeochemistry of Environmentally Important Trace Elements (pp. 95-114). American Chemical Society.
Nehnevajova, E., Herzig, R., Federer, G., Erismann, K. H., & Schwitzguébel, J. P. (2005). Screening of sunflower cultivars for metal phytoextraction in a contaminated field prior to mutagenesis. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 7(4), 337-349.
Ebbs, S. D., & Kochian, L. V. (1997). Toxicity of zinc and copper to Brassica species: implications for phytoremediation. Journal of Environmental Quality, 26(3), 776-781.
Citterio, S., Sanità di Toppi, L., Vattuone, Z., Nardini, M., Prato, M., Terzano, R., ... & Gallo, A. (2010). Heavy metal tolerance and accumulation of Cd, Cr and Ni by Cannabis s
